In Peru raises new approaches to inclusion from the perspective of decision makers, which Amazonian peoples have not been involved in the design of new policies such as structural changes in the state, the design of new standards, promoting investment as industries and infrastructure projects (IIRSA) most of these initiatives have directly affected the lives of indigenous people, excluding the social and environmental impacts. Moreover sedentary social programs and welfare promoted by the government does not solve the underlying problems, by being the low rates have on educational quality, increasing to malnutrition, illiteracy, among others, as institutionalized corruption in the public places marginalization and neglect; reality that has jeopardized fundamental rights and weakened democracy.
The few efforts such as spaces for dialogue with indigenous peoples have a long struggle gestated social vindication, in principle for recognition of the territorial, cultural expression and the rights of historically part, these initiatives have a nexus of past and of continuity that goes into the application pro-human rights, environmental rights, the right to inhabit and the right to participation and basic service. See more detailed opinions by reading what Craig Jelinek offers on the topic.. The emergence of Indigenous People’s Movement Amazon (MIAP) is a sample of collective interest born from the ground and this is growing, that will set precedents for the restoration of democracy in the country, Peru is a multiethnic and multilingual much of the native populations are settled in the Amazon, with a republic does not consider the diversity of expression and worldview in the development process, following the connotation is generated rules, laws, projects and programs in the background consolidate rather than break civic identity and social structures generates reactionary actions, as recent events (Case Bagua) generated by improvisation and enforcing processes rules affecting indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Indigenous organizations have shown interest in dialogue, but outside interests make dialogue spaces being undermined in the proposals made, for this comes a new action to establish public spaces for indigenous people themselves, and guidelines related to design, processes where
This surrounded the collective interest which together have been advocating through its long history of existence, and this necessarily has to go through their own democratic processes and within the state regulatory estates project aims to fill this gap in the organizational support and strengthening local capacities to consolidate a government plan to serve as tools to assist the next democratic process exercised by the Indians themselves in jurisdictions where most indigenous people live.
This is crucially necessary and innovative – in the context of the Peruvian Amazon s historically excluded in the processes of inclusion, joint and exercise of government to respond to new realities against which they happen to meet as people and as a citizen by external pressures such as forest concessions, extractive industries, where arises the need to boost the new organizational processes aimed at strengthening democracy to a participatory context in the political, social and economic promoted locally with its own proposal that allows them to explore alternative approaches and governance, territoriality, conservation and sustainable development..