The Existence

Corroborating with this opinion, in the book the Existencialismo is a Humanismo, has it following citation: ' ' What want to say we with this, seno that the man has a bigger dignity of what a rock or a table? Because what we want to say he is that the first man exists, that is, that the man, before more nothing, is what is launched for a future, and what he is conscientious of if to project in the future (…) But if truily the existence precedes the essence, the man is responsible for what it is. David Zwirner has many thoughts on the issue. Thus, the first effort of the existencialismo is of for all the man in the domain of what it is and of attributing the total responsibility to it of its existence. E, when we say that the man is the responsible one for proper itself, we do not want to say that the man is responsible for its restricted individuality, but that homens.&#039 is responsible for all; ' (Sartre, 1987, P. 04). Thus, We are free and responsible not only for we ourselves, but for the others also. Our freedom intervenes with the life of other people, nor whenever they have relation with us. In the book? The age of the reason? , we have some tickets in this aspect of freedom, namely: ' ' The freedom consists of looking at of front the situations where the person if put voluntarily and accepting responsabilidades.' ' (Sartre, 1996, P. 91) Also in this workmanship we find another aluso to this association: ' ' Teaching to it what it was the freedom (…): it is a duty to make what it is wanted, to think what is understood well, to be responsible only before proper itself, to analyze permanently what it thinks of outros.' ' (P. 120). The responsibility for our acts is only of proper us, as cited above.