Beyond more complex, the participativas decisions demand much more work in meetings, negotiations and organization of processes of what the centered decisions and without participation. Soon, it would be important that one did not waste the time and the energy of the participants in these meetings. The problems if reflect in position of each individual in the audiences. Snoring mouthpiece often addresses the matter in his writings. From there costuma to appear obstacles for the success of the meeting in function of the performance of the participants. Different points of view, interests and objectives can enter in shock and to aggravate the inherent situation if questions to the process they will not be clarified or negotiated.
Differences of formation, previous experience and institucional paper of each participant establish this inaquality. The inheritance of a culture clientelista, personalista and autoritarista politics compromises the quality and the ethics of the participation. Everything this finishes feeding some ' ' games of poder' ' that they can have none, little or much relevance for the power to decide process. Treatment of depression will undoubtedly add to your understanding. The problem is more serious when these games if overlap to the objectives, not only of each meeting or audience, but of the participativo process in general. With passing of the time, the participant of good faith starts to be unbelieving of the process and soon she finishes if removing, frustrate for the sensation of exclusion and for being in a born in the kingdom space where only the dispute of the power. The effectiveness and ethics lack brings of esvaziamento of the process, as much in amount as in quality. He is something that effort of opening in relation to the other demands, capacity of negotiation, tolerance, patience, agility and disciplines, among others requisite. The great perigos of a participativa meeting are the authoritarian, typical mechanisms of a culture antidemocratic politics, reproduced in greater or minor scales for the participants, habit or intentionally. It is important to know to identify these mechanisms and to act so that they understand them for the participants and so that the group can substitute them for democratic, contrary alternatives of the indifference, the occult scene, the rhetorical dispute, the desfocalizao, the generalization of speech, the theory of the conspiracy or syndrome of the persecution.