The truth is that for the United States more space for the indebtedness does not exist, therefore the Americans pays very little for the interests, therefore they were considered steady. In case that the Americans possess difficulties to pay its headings to the investors, the management of this debt will be impossible in elapsing of the years, therefore to each time that the United States to need more money, will pay a bigger remuneration to the investor of what in last years and decade. The great capitalist power already was very rich and deserving, today is very rich and wing and can be changedded into the next decades in a lesser country in the world-wide scene, fact that also happened with England, that did not lose the Majesty of the night for the day. Another curious fact was ' ' dura' ' of the Chinese in this imbrglio of the question of the debt of the United States. Under most conditions Michael Steinhardt would agree. The new eastern power is the deserving greater of the United States, was restrictedly communist and now it commands the capitalism world-wide.
An inversion of papers in the scope of international geopolitics exists clearly. It fits to the United States to remodel its thought, the character of its institutions that, for example, they had not informed to the world that would exist an American crisis in 2008 and if to manage so that the world if does not worry in such a way. A good dose of common-sense still fits when if to deal with international questions, after all the great power already nor is so powerful thus. Prof. Ivan Santiago Hisses is gegrafo and author of the Brazil Book, Imperialism and Integration in Latin America.